Thursday, December 10, 2015

The twelfth case study for CMA (Final) Group 3 students-

Paper 15 - Business Strategy and Strategic Cost Management

CASE STUDY ON PORTER’S FIVE FORCES MODEL

Taifa Bank, a subsidiary of an International Bank has experienced a serious decline in its business performance. The deposits are down, the loan portfolio has a lot of bad debts and head office is planning to slash the level of investment in the bank. Use Porter‘s Five Forces of Competition Model to establish the impact of competition on the overall performance of the bank. Explain how Taifa Bank can use Porter‘s Five Forces Model in evaluating why there has been a decline in performance.

Answer:

The Five Forces model can provide useful information in regard to the decline in performance of the bank. It is worth assuming that forces in the market such as competition has resulted in declining profits, inability to attract quality clients and general poor reaction to competitive moves in the market. Michael Porter's 5 forces analysis is a framework for industry analysis and business strategy development developed by Michael Porter of Harvard Business School in 1979. It uses concepts developed in Industrial Organization (IO) economics to derive 5 forces that determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a market. Porter referred to these forces as the microenvironment, to contrast it with the more general term macro environment. They consist of those forces close to a company that affect its ability to serve its customers and make a profit. A change in any of the forces normally requires a company to re-assess the marketplace.
Strategy consultants use Porter's five forces framework when making a qualitative evaluation of a firm's strategic position. The framework is textbook material for modern business studies and therefore widely known. Porter's Five Forces include three forces from 'horizontal' competition: threat of substitute products, the threat of established rivals, and the threat of new entrants; and two forces from 'vertical' competition: the bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of customers. Each of these forces has several determinants.
The Bargaining power of suppliers
Every organization has suppliers of services which are used to produce the final services and porter suggested that the suppliers are more powerful when; there are only a few suppliers, there are no substitute for the products supplied, when suppliers price form a great part of the total cost of the organization, (Richard lynch 2003.). The major suppliers of fund to Taifa bank are the depositors. The customers‟ deposit form a huge part of the banks working capital, however the bank has investment in overseas countries with a competitive advantage of sourcing for funds from overseas. In order to increase its customers deposit and maintain its sustainability there is a need to offer higher interest rate to its customers, and maintain its tenacity in the corporate world.
The Bargaining power of buyers
 Buyers‟ bargaining power increases in situations where; there are higher concentration of buyers than suppliers, there is ability to easily switch to undifferentiated substitute products, availability of market information to the buyer. The customers have more bargaining power due to higher concentration and market knowledge, however Taifa bank should have an advantage in term of product offered; free credit cards along with e-banking and insurance services, which are different from what is offered by its competitors making it uneasy for buyers to switch.
The threat of potential new entrants
According to (John L Thompson 2002) “where barriers to entry are high new entrants are likely to be deterred”, however he also stated that, “if there is an attempted entry there are likely to be reaction from existing competitors.” Barriers to entry can be caused by the following factors; economies of scale, product differentiation, capital requirement, switching cost. There are statutory capital requirement to entry into the banking sector which stands as barrier to new firm entering the industry, also over the years the Taifa bank has invested huge funds from its years of operation to build a huge capital base, which new entrants would find very difficult to meet.
However microfinance banks can pose a threat to Taifa bank by targeting the low income earners and the small business owners which Taifa could not reach due to high transaction cost.
The Threats of Substitute
If there are close substitutes, demand for a particular brand will increase or decrease as its price move upwards and downwards relative to competitors, (John L Thompson 2002). Furthermore, (Richard lynch 2003), is of the opinion that substitutes do not entirely replace existing products, but may limit the profit in an industry by keeping prices down. Key issues analysed are; the possible threat of obsolescence, the ability of customers to switch to the substitute, the cost of providing some added services to prevent customers switching. Taifa bank operates in an environment where competitors offer identical products, for Taifa to be ahead of its competitors it offers different products, which ranges from; insurance, mutual funds or fixed income securities. However the presence of non-banking financial institution providing the same services poses a great threat to the sustainability of Taifa bank.
The extent of competitive rivalry
Competition among companies may take the form of price competition, innovations, advertising and promotions, or value added services. However before deciding upon competitive actions firms must attempt to predict how their competitors will react. (John L Thompson 2002). The intensity of competition, according to (John L Thompson 2002), depends on; the number of competitors and degree of concentration, the rate of growth in the industry, degree of differentiation, the extent of which competitors are aware of the strategies of their rivals and exit barriers.
The analysis of the competitive advantage of Taifa bank shows that;
The bargaining power of the suppliers is high;
The bargaining power of the buyers is high;
The threats of potential new entrants are medium;
The threat of substitutes is high;
The extent of competitive rivalry is high.
Useful information that the Bank can derive is as follows:
Statistical Analysis
1.The Five Forces Analysis allows determining the attractiveness of an industry. The decline in profitability may be due to the industry becoming less attractive. 2. It provides insights on profitability. The model can assist determine how the forces have driven the costs up or reduced turnover that the bank can make. 3. Thus, it supports decisions about entry to or exit from an industry or a market segment. This is helpful for the bank in the context of whether it has been easy for new firms to enter or difficult for other banks to leave. The combination intensifies competition that may impact on the performance of the bank. 4. Moreover, the model can be used to compare the impact of competitive forces on their own organization with their impact on competitors. Taifa bank must evaluate the extent to which the forces have impacted on their operations in relation to competitors. 5. Competitors may have different options to react to changes in competitive forces from their different resources and competences. A comparison of how the bank has developed strategic options in response to the forces can be helpful.
Dynamical analysis
In combination with a PEST – Analysis, which reveals drivers for change in an industry, Five Forces analysis can reveal insights about the potential future attractiveness of the industry. Expected Political, Economical, Socio-demographical and Technological change can influence the five competitive forces and thus have impact on industry structures.
Analysis of Options
With the knowledge about intensity and power of competitive forces, organizations can develop options to influence them in a way that improves their own competitive position. The result could be a new strategic direction, e.g. a new positioning, differentiation for competitive products of strategic partnerships.
This, Porters model of five competitive Forces allows a systematic and structured analysis of market structure and competitive situation. The model can be applied to particular companies, market segments, industries or regions. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the scope of the market to be analysed in a first step. Following all relevant forces for this market are identified and analysed. Hence, it is not necessary to analyse all elements of all competitive forces with the same depth.
The five forces Model is based on microeconomics. It takes into account supply and demand, complementary products and substitutes, the relationship between volume of production and cost of production, and market structures like monopoly, oligopoly or perfect competition.
                                                                                                                                  Source: PTP - December 2013 of ICAI

The eleventh case study for CMA (Final) Group 3 students-

Paper 15 - Business Strategy and Strategic Cost Management

CASE STUDY ON BCG MATRIX

Hassan is one of the India‘s leading detergent manufacturing companies. The firm has more than twenty-five product types. These have been developed over a period of its ten year existence. Some products are very successful while others have not performed well. The challenge for the board has been the formulation of strategy policy in the way the company manages the portfolio of products. As a newly recruited qualified Cost Accountant, your advice is being sought to address the following questions the Product manager has prepared as input into his paper to the Board. 
(a) Describe the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) growth vector matrix. 
(b) Explain what strategic options are available to Hassan in accordance to the BCG Matrix. 
(c) Outline what limitations the model poses to the Product Manager as he prepares his paper to the Board.

Answer:

(a) The BCG Matrix is a model used to analyze the portfolio of strategic business units, investments and products according to their cash generating capabilities whose function is relative market share and market growth rate. This results into 4 categories being: question marks (future potential earners), stars (increasing good positive cash flow), cash cows (cash rich) and dogs (declining cash flows). 
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix is a portfolio planning model developed by Bruce Henderson of the Boston Consulting Group in the early 1970's. It is based on the observation that a company's business units can be classified into four categories based on combinations of market growth and market share relative to the largest competitor, hence the name "growth-share". Market growth serves as a proxy for industry attractiveness, and relative market share serves as a proxy for competitive advantage. The growth-share matrix thus maps the business unit positions within these two important determinants of profitability. 

BCG Growth-Share Matrix

This framework assumes that an increase in relative market share will result in an increase in the generation of cash. This assumption often is true because of the experience curve; increased relative market share implies that the firm is moving forward on the experience curve relative to its competitors, thus developing a cost advantage. A second assumption is that a growing market requires investment in assets to increase capacity and therefore results in the consumption of cash. Thus the position of a business on the growth-share matrix provides an indication of its cash generation and its cash consumption. Henderson reasoned that the cash required by rapidly growing business units could be obtained from the firm's other business units that were at a more mature stage and generating significant cash. By investing to become the market share leader in a rapidly growing market, the business unit could move along the experience curve and develop a cost advantage. From this reasoning, the BCG Growth-Share Matrix was born. The four categories are:
 Dogs - Dogs have low market share and a low growth rate and thus neither generate nor consume a large amount of cash. However, dogs are cash traps because of the money tied up in a business that has little potential. Such businesses are candidates for divestiture. 
Question marks - Question marks are growing rapidly and thus consume large amounts of cash, but because they have low market shares they do not generate much cash. The result is a large net cash comsumption. A question mark (also known as a "problem child") has the potential to gain market share and become a star, and eventually a cash cow when the market growth slows. If the question mark does not succeed in becoming the market leader, then after perhaps years of cash consumption it will degenerate into a dog when the market growth declines. Question marks must be analyzed carefully in order to determine whether they are worth the investment required to grow market share.
 Stars - Stars generate large amounts of cash because of their strong relative market share, but also consume large amounts of cash because of their high growth rate; therefore the cash in each direction approximately nets out. If a star can maintain its large market share, it will become a cash cow when the market growth rate declines. The portfolio of a diversified company always should have stars that will become the next cash cows and ensure future cash generation. 
Cash cows - As leaders in a mature market, cash cows exhibit a return on assets that is greater than the market growth rate, and thus generate more cash than they consume. Such business units should be "milked", extracting the profits and investing as little cash as possible. Cash cows provide the cash required to turn question marks into market leaders, to cover the administrative costs of the company, to fund research and development, to service the corporate debt, and to pay dividends to shareholders. Because the cash cow generates a relatively stable cash flow, its value can be determined with reasonable accuracy by calculating the present value of its cash stream using a discounted cash flow analysis.
 Under the growth-share matrix model, as an industry matures and its growth rate declines, a business unit will become either a cash cow or a dog, determined soley by whether it had become the market leader during the period of high growth. While originally developed as a model for resource allocation among the various business units in a corporation, the growth-share matrix also can be used for resource allocation among products within a single business unit. Its simplicity is its strength - the relative positions of the firm's entire business portfolio can be displayed in a single diagram.

(b) Hassan has four strategic choices when we look at the BCG Matrix. They include: Build - this is where Hassan uses funds from other products to invest in question marks or stars. These funds are usually harvested from cash cows. This is about moving excess cash around various product lines especially those with potential for growth but lacking own funds for reinvestments. Hold - this is where funds are ploughed back or profits reinvested. This is applicable to question marks and stars. Harvest - this is where funds are milked out of cash cows and used to build question marks and stars. Divest - this is applicable in cases where Hassan discontinues operations of product lines that are no longer profitable. 

(c) The limitations include: (i) Market information regarding aggregate demand and market shares held by competing firms may not be readily available or too expensive to obtain. (ii) Too simplistic by assuming that cash flow is affected by only market growth rate and relative market share. (iii) Assumes that only longer staying firms in the market can build competitive edge. In modern business environments, this is not possible. We have seen new entrants easily overtaking long established firms. . 

Source: PTP - December 2013 of ICAI